Canada Research Chair in Innovative Learning and Technology & Associate Professor at Royal Roads University

Networked Scholars, the book: Chapter summaries

Posted on November 7th, by George Veletsianos in my research, networked scholars, NPS, open, scholarship, sharing. 24 comments

I am writing a book focused on experiences and practices surrounding scholars’ online participation, and I don’t think I’ve blogged about it yet, though I’ve mentioned it multiple times. Let’s call this “the inaugural blog post concerning the Networked Scholars book.” The book will be published by Routledge. It’s due in mid-March.


Diagram of a social network. Image in the public domain.

I plan on blogging about the book as I am writing it. I want to share this work (and I have negotiated with the publisher to post 50% of the final product here), and I want to blog about it in order to think out loud about the book and to help improve it. Networked Scholars (the book, not the MOOC) summarizes the existing research on the use of social media and online networks by academics. In the book, I examine scholars’ practices and experiences with social media and online social networks. While the book synthesizes all existing research, the investigation is largely qualitative and ethnographic.

The book is currently divided in 8 chapters. Each chapter describes online social networks from a different angle:

Chapter 1: Introduction. Introduces the reader to networked participatory scholarship (social media, online networks, openness, networked practice). Introduces significant concepts appearing throughout the book: (a) deterministic perspective (social media shape scholarship), (b) social shaping perspective (technologies are shaped by social, cultural, economic, and political factors, and academics have the agency to accept or reject any particular technology or to find alternative uses for it that will better serve their needs), (c) context collapse, (d) “social media as instrument to achieve valued scholarly outcomes” narrative (e.g., more citations), and (e) “social media as gathering places” narrative (e.g., finding community).

Chapter 2: Networks of knowledge creation and dissemination. In this chapter, I  describe how scholars are using online networks to engage in knowledge creation and dissemination. I  describe how academics use particular technologies and practices to do and share research and present examples of academics doing research online, reaching new understandings, and supporting communities in creating knowledge. Case studies illuminate this chapter.

Chapter 3: Networks of tension and conflict. The main argument in this chapter is that even though the hope for positive outcomes has led many academics and educational institutions to advocate the adoption of social media, online social networks, and various open practices, scholars’ online participation appears to be rife with tensions, dilemmas, and conundrums. I describe a number of challenges that academics face when they online, and discuss how these shape participation.

Chapter 4: Networks of care and vulnerability. As contemporary narratives pertaining to impact, productivity, automation, efficiency, algorithms, follower counts, citation counts, impact factors, branding, and so on infuse academic lives, it’s easy to fall into the trap of viewing technologies merely as instruments that are used toward the achievement of particular professional outcomes. In this chapter, I discuss how social media & online networks function as places where (some) academics make themselves vulnerable and where they express and experience care.

Chapter 6: Fragmented Networks. In this chapter, I will explain that scholars’ identity online potentially consists of a constellation of identity fragments. What scholars reveal online about themselves is mediated by a variety of issues including professional concerns, collapsed contexts, imagined and invisible audiences, and identity work. This chapter will argue that what we see happening in social networks and media represents fragments of life.

Chapter 7: Transparent Networks. Here, I expand on openness and transparency and discuss how transparency relates to teaching, research, and scholarship. I discuss transparency in teaching and student-instructor interaction (e.g., instructor and teacher participation in open courses), transparency in the publishing process (e.g., The Paper Rejection Repository) and transparency in other areas of scholarship and participation (e.g., The Adjunct Project).

Chapter 8: Future Directions. Synthesis and suggestions for future research.

24 thoughts on “Networked Scholars, the book: Chapter summaries

  1. George, Thanks for sharing this. I think it would be a fine contribution to the field. When taking a look at the chapters and seeing different variations of “networks”, I thought how about a chapter on “Networks of Interest” (communities of interest) which is very relevant to the topic. When people/scholars are using social media for different purposes and engaged in various online networks, they are sharing their common interests, experiences, and information through different tools which develop kinds of networks of interest. I think this topic needs further development that you might consider to tackle in your book or as part of a chapter.

  2. Pingback: RT @veletsianos: @JeffreyKeefer Networked particip… « Silence and Voice

  3. Pingback: With our own meaning | Music for Deckchairs

  4. Pingback: Social media in academia & Networked Scholars: The book cover | George Veletsianos

  5. Pingback: Introduction: What does couchsurfing have to do with networked scholarship? | George Veletsianos

  6. Pingback: The couches of strangers, and three perspectives on the relationship between social media and scholarship | George Veletsianos

  7. Pingback: Networked Scholars: Another update | George Veletsianos

  8. Pingback: Crowdsourcing Scholarship – more updates from the Networked Scholars book | George Veletsianos

Leave a Reply to Mohsen Saadatmand Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *