<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The disintegration of the real-virtual binary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.veletsianos.com/2008/11/15/the-disintegration-of-the-real-virtual-binary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.veletsianos.com/2008/11/15/the-disintegration-of-the-real-virtual-binary/</link>
	<description>A place to log ideas and thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:55:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Veletsianos &#187; Archive &#187; Two perspectives on the role of technology on being and life</title>
		<link>http://www.veletsianos.com/2008/11/15/the-disintegration-of-the-real-virtual-binary/comment-page-1/#comment-3962</link>
		<dc:creator>George Veletsianos &#187; Archive &#187; Two perspectives on the role of technology on being and life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veletsianos.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-3962</guid>
		<description>[...] identity&#8221; and &#8220;virtual identity&#8221; (e.g., I have noted in the past that I no longer believe that there&#8217;s a clear demarcation between real and virtual), and the degree to which each student draws inferences about the role of technology based on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] identity&#8221; and &#8220;virtual identity&#8221; (e.g., I have noted in the past that I no longer believe that there&#8217;s a clear demarcation between real and virtual), and the degree to which each student draws inferences about the role of technology based on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Measuring (and forging a path to) openness&#160;&#124;&#160;George Veletsianos</title>
		<link>http://www.veletsianos.com/2008/11/15/the-disintegration-of-the-real-virtual-binary/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Measuring (and forging a path to) openness&#160;&#124;&#160;George Veletsianos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veletsianos.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-267</guid>
		<description>[...] More importantly however, in line with developing a Measurement of Openness in Education Systems (George&#8217;s phrase), we need to develop guidelines on becoming open thus forging a path to openness. As highlighted in the various discussions occurring at the moment surrounding &#8220;openness&#8221; (here, here, here, and here), the term and it&#8217;s meaning are somewhat mystified. To confuse you even more, I suggest that being open doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean being open, which I gather is the point behind Siemen&#8217;s latest posts.  For example, having a university-wide statement on openness is not the same as adopting and actively supporting an institutional repository or providing incentives for instructors to teach open courses. I keep returning to the shades of gray idea: We usually treat issues as if they are black or white when in actuality they are not. There is no one single notion of closed, open, virtual, real, hybrid education, online learning, constructivism, and so on. There are multiple shades of gray in much the same way that there are multiple variations on constructivism, in much the same way that virtual experiences are quite real. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More importantly however, in line with developing a Measurement of Openness in Education Systems (George&#8217;s phrase), we need to develop guidelines on becoming open thus forging a path to openness. As highlighted in the various discussions occurring at the moment surrounding &#8220;openness&#8221; (here, here, here, and here), the term and it&#8217;s meaning are somewhat mystified. To confuse you even more, I suggest that being open doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean being open, which I gather is the point behind Siemen&#8217;s latest posts.  For example, having a university-wide statement on openness is not the same as adopting and actively supporting an institutional repository or providing incentives for instructors to teach open courses. I keep returning to the shades of gray idea: We usually treat issues as if they are black or white when in actuality they are not. There is no one single notion of closed, open, virtual, real, hybrid education, online learning, constructivism, and so on. There are multiple shades of gray in much the same way that there are multiple variations on constructivism, in much the same way that virtual experiences are quite real. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Veletsianos</title>
		<link>http://www.veletsianos.com/2008/11/15/the-disintegration-of-the-real-virtual-binary/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>George Veletsianos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veletsianos.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Nice to see you on here Tobias!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see you on here Tobias!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llamaman</title>
		<link>http://www.veletsianos.com/2008/11/15/the-disintegration-of-the-real-virtual-binary/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>llamaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veletsianos.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Brilliantly stated, Professor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliantly stated, Professor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

